Saturday, June 20, 2026

Can I Be Frank (4*)


While re-reading my journals--I'm nearing the end of my 50th blue hardcover, each 120 pages long--I find that topical jokes really pinpoint a moment in time that may have receded from memory.  Like this one during the AIDS epidemic:  

Do you know the hardest thing about an HIV-positive diagnosis?  Convincing your parents you're Haitian!

You probably have to have lived through those awful early years to find that mordant joke funny now that marriage equality is the law of the land and we've entered an era of "gay elder" appreciation.  The latter is a driving force behind "Can I Be Frank?," a frenetic Pride month performance during which Morgan Bassichis, standing in front of a life "preserver" backdrop, pays tribute to Frank Maya, America's first openly gay stand-up comic. Sometimes, homage can be a form of resurrection; Maya died in 1995, just before protease inhibitors commuted AIDS from the death penalty to life imprisonment.


Unfamiliar with Maya, I watched him being interviewed by Dick Cavett, who I normally enjoy, but whose supercilious discomfort with homosexuality in 1991 was more than a little off-putting.  Maya, three years my senior, seemed pretty laid back: the kind of "masc" hunk instantly recognizable only to other friends of Dorothy and their "hags," but whom few other people would peg as somebody who enjoyed getting fucked.  Bassichis, on the other hand, is a screaming queen who aptly describes himself as something that walked in "out of a folk tale." But he adds a contemporary patina of knowing, ironic fierceness to Maya's routines, some of which have aged better than others.  Celebrity letters from heaven, for example, is hilarious if you get the references.


One joke, in particular, pretty much sums up the differences between comedy then and now, and between Maya and Bassichis.  Maya asserts that fame is the only cure for homosexuality, which Bassichis initially interprets as the compensating reward that material comforts and acceptance provide.  Maya, however, got the laugh because going back in the closet and insisting you're straight is the only way you can maintain fame once you achieve it.  Just ask the much better-remembered Pee-wee Herman.

Bassichis shifts gears at the end, adding a kind of teachable moment about how the LGBTQ+ community has persevered in the face of discrimination and tragedy. Like Maya, he incorporates music into his performance, transforming the title of a 1989 essay by Douglas Crimp, another gay elder, into a requiem he sings over to a suddenly quiet, sobered house:  mourning and militancy, he drones again and again.

It's advice about carrying on that, unlike humor, doesn't seem to have aged at all.

Friday, June 19, 2026

John of John (5*)


Imagine Falabay, a remote place in Scotland where Nature brooks no quarter, where the land and the sea have offered only meager employment for centuries, where an older generation still takes pride in speaking Gaelic and where, in a winking concession to the times, the bellwether ram has been replaced by an ewe on the Macleod croft now being worked by a handsome but stubborn weaver named John. 

Imagine that John, the father for whom you have been named even though everyone calls you Cal (your middle name) has guilt-tripped you into coming home from a life of listless couch surfing in Glasgow after graduating from fashion school because your gran's feet have turned purple.  

Imagine returning to an insular community where everyone is hiding something but there aren't many secrets except one that has been kept in your own home.  Where John, who leads the congregation in song on Sundays, punches you in the face because you've bleached your already dyed long hair with peroxide instead of cutting it before accompanying him to church.

His father put all his faith in the Presbyterian penicillin. For whatever ailed you there was only one cure: work and prayer.

Imagine you've brought Ella, the grandmother who raised you, an unusual gift because she loved teaching you filthy expressions as you beach combed together during your childhood, when your discerning eye for subtle gradations of color told your father one thing and her another. 

By now, you've probably guessed that Cal carries the Macleod family secret. Not so fast. Douglas Stuart pulls the rug out from under the reader, if not his title characters, almost immediately with an omniscient revelation less about sexual orientation than the very real and sometimes cringey costs of hiding it.

To pay off Cal's student debt, John forces his battered son to help him weave the wool they gather from their flock even though Scottish law allows only one person per croft to work a single loom as a form of quality control.  After passing inspection, their work--which is indistinguishable, even to expert eyes--officially becomes Harris tweed, named for one of the islands in the Outer Hebrides.  


In middle age, I outgrew a brown sports jacket made of the same material, ignorant of its origins until now.  My own father called it "snazzy," his highest form of sartorial praise. I lamented donating the jacket to the Salvation Army as much as I loved Stuart's novel, which is just as intricately and colorfully woven,  even if its resolution--which appears to have been engineered by a martyred saint weaned on romantic comedy--does defy credulity a wee bit. 

But before then, Stuart thrusts the reader into a pre-internet world where rural "benders"--men who have sex with men--don't think of themselves as gay.  Cal discovers his sexuality by watching videotapes with Doll, whose family isn't as religious as John.

He had liked the T’s best. T for Top Gun or Total Recall or Terminator. And it was on a November afternoon, when Arnold Schwarzenegger first landed naked in a car park overlooking LA, that Cal sat with one of Mrs Macdonald’s cushions clamped over his lap. He lied to Doll about having diarrhoea, then he went home and prayed for forgiveness, crouching behind the sunken caravan.

(No wonder queer Scots seem so hung up on masculinity!  See also Half-Man.)

College cures Cal of the need to pray, and he learns something from a friend with benefits who proposes they live together after graduation.

Sammy was the opposite of his father in all things, and the moment he had realised this was the moment he realised he could never love him.

And like most gay men still in the closet, he was relieved to have a female best friend, Isla, who also functioned as a "beard."

There had been a tacit expectation, a faint, cheering hope amongst the faithful that when they were older, they might reunite, court properly, marry quickly. The sweetness of their relationship had brought him uncomplicated happiness and at the same time a sense of protection.  Whenever the men looked at him with that faint unease, whenever he laughed too loudly, or stood with all his weight on one hip, she came to mind and soothed whatever doubt they had. She had been like an overcoat that let him blend in, a skinned fleece he could tie around himself that let him wander amongst the flock without fear of rejection.

Stuart anchors John of John in a place as far from "gay" urban culture as Kansas is from Oz yet much of his gripping melodrama seems oddly familiar and not only because I've taken the same ferry that Cal does when he returns from school. I had a couple of beards, our Walkmans played the same new wave music (his amusing reference to the Smiths is spot on), I've replied to a personals ad, people have told me I was in love with my father, and, like so many gay men who flee their hometown,  I've faced the exact same question that drives the novel's narrative.

Will he stay, or will he go?  The answer left me in a puddle of skeptical, if hopeful tears that once again had me counting my lucky, lucky stars.

More Douglas Stuart:



Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Landschaften

In German, "Landschaften" means landscapes.  Gerhard Richter, whose art has been profoundly shaped by history--he's 93--has freighted his with meaning beyond the merely scenic.  I've been a big fan since seeing his 2002 retrospective at MoMA and Never Look Away, a mesmerizing film based on his life that he disavowed for being "too biographical" after watching only the trailer.

Although I'd been to many of the locations Richter depicts in his show at the David Zwirner gallery in Chelsea, none looked familiar except the Sphinx. 
I'm not sure I would have appreciated these paintings as much as I did without having read Jason Farago's review in the Times.  It literally gave me goosebumps, something criticism hasn't done very often since Pauline Kael died.

[Richter] wanted to paint the sea, the sky, the mountain, even while knowing it was impossible to do so without automatically painting the social meaning of the sea, the sky, the mountain. The blurred landscape — teasing us with the pleasures of the pastoral, and then letting it melt before our eyes — was nothing less than a moral argument for how to look and how to think when every route seemed barred. You had to do it ambivalently, self-critically, and while risking irrelevance or cliché. But it could be done.

"Seascape" (1975)
"Vesuvius" (1976)
Germany's history in the 20th century required a new way of "looking and thinking," that's for sure.  Hitler temporarily whitewashed his genocidal agenda for world domination by hosting the 1936 Winter Olympics in Garmisch. The Third Reich removed anti-Semitic signage before the games began and even fielded a Jew on the home ice hockey team who agreed to play only if the Nazis spared his family  The Alps' white purity served as both metaphor and camouflage.

"Garmisch" (1981)
Here's the painting where Richter's new way of looking and thinking  hit me like a ton of bricks.  "Buche" is German for beech tree, and a forest of beech trees is "Buchenwald."  

Beech Tree (1987)
More Farago, the paragraph that propelled me to leave a mash note in the Comments section of the Times:

Today we are cursed, even more than when Richter painted the works in this extraordinary show, to live in a time of extreme image hyperplasia. Computationally produced pictures (there is nothing “artificially intelligent” about them) are now inundating every pipe and orifice of our personal and political lives. The image produced by prompting a large language model glitches as it propagates. It has no roots, no referents. And as these A.I. models produce imagery at a crazed clip, they are hollowing out the very basis of depiction — worming through the last little faith we once had in images to reveal us the world as it is.

Yet it's sometimes difficult for a casual viewer like me to distinguish between Richter's landscapes

"Venice" (1986)
. . . and his abstractions.

"Window" (1985)
(detail)
Two other works in the show had titles nodding to the church.  I'm still chewing on them although God knows I've always been skeptical of religion.

Cathedral Corner II (1988)
Obviousness is the hallmark of the art on the High Line.  Not that there's anything wrong with that. Onur celebrates environmentalists searching for new solutions in "Beacons," a large mural at W 21st Street


. . . and Derek Fordjour explores Black archetypes of "spectacle and commerce" such as "Seduction"

. . . and "Resilience."


I've always envied people who live in London Terrace and not just because it houses an Olympic-size swimming pool.  


I never noticed the street entrance to Mercado Little Spain before.  It's so much more appealing than the down escalator from the mall at Hudson Yards that Tom and I used after checking out Luna Luna.  We enjoyed a terrific tapas meal.

Flags representing all 48 World Cup competitors hang from the Vessel.

By the time I reached "The Light That Shines Through the Universe" by Tuan Andrew Nguyen on the High Line extension, we were back in Richter territory, perhaps because the Vietnames/American artist was born into historical circumstances just as complicated. His first solo show at the New Museum several years ago really struck a chord given my fascination with his native country. While the Taliban's destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan inspired this stand-alone commission, he tweaks it by incorporating melted and polished ordnance gathered in the wake of America's military assault on North Vietnam, thus transforming the reconstituted figure with outstretched arms into a hopeful symbol.

Sculptor Charles Ray has given residents and office workers near Manhattan West something to ponder:  dressing Adam and Eve, the forebears of Christian humanity, in modern attire and casting them in stainless steel.  Is it just me or does Eve look suspiciously like Steve?

 

The West 31st entrance to Moynihan Station, just down the block, was new to me.  Look up and you'll see "The Hive" by Elmgreen & Dragset.

Friday, June 12, 2026

Yes I Can (4*)


Sammy Davis, Jr. was all over television when I was growing up; even my garage-bound father enjoyed his frequent variety show appearances. And thanks to the Literary Guild, Yes I Can, his thick 1965 autobiography, brightened our bookshelves with its spine blaring the affirmative title in bright yellow and red.  But I didn't pay much attention to Davis because my eyes and ears were mostly tuned in to the Swinging 60s not the Rat Pack in Vegas.


I do, however, remember a famous 1972 episode of "All in the Family" when Davis, playing himself, drops by bigoted Archie Bunker's house in Queens to retrieve a briefcase he has left behind in a cab. Archie asks the "world's greatest living entertainer" (as he was then known in a pre-EGOT world) to take a picture together.  Just as the shutter clicks, Davis plants a kiss on Archie's cheek.  The stunned reaction of America's most lovable bigot supposedly produced the longest laugh ever from a studio audience just as it also exposed Davis's willingness to do anything he could to make himself as appealing as possible to a white, liberal audience.  He was more Martin Luther King than Malcolm X or Huey P. Newton.

As the decades passed, I didn't think much about Davis until sometime during the Obama administration when I learned that Las Vegas aggressively enforced Jim Crow laws in the 1950s.  The owners of The New Frontier Hotel and Casino, where Davis was headlining, had emptied and refilled a pool after he took a dip so that their patrons wouldn't have to swim in tainted water.

Davis doesn't mention the story in the book but it's typical of the unrelenting racism that Davis describes with grim specificity until the age of 40, when Yes, I Can concludes. He has weathered the controversy that erupted after his marriage to a Swedish actress, and returned to New York City's premier nightclub, the Copacabana, where he had broken the color barrier a decade earlier in a trio with his father and uncle. After learning that the stage size has been reduced to accommodate the demand for tickets, he takes a moment to reflect.

I’d taken a stand in life, not through courage, but out of necessity. I had opened the only door available to me, and I’d walked through it with May into the limelight or into oblivion, whichever it might be, but together. There’s been no compromise, simply, “I have done what I believe in and here I stand, good, bad or indifferent, I hope you will still like me, but if you don’t, I will regret it, but I cannot change.“ I wasn’t hedging anymore, trying to please everyone, and my missing rapport with the audience had returned with all the intensity it had ever had, perhaps more.

Yes, I Can, written with friends Jane and Burt Boyar, is definitely an artifact of another, more brutal era.  Look no further for proof than a 1951 review of the Will Mastin Trio's debut as headliners featuring "Little Sammy" (then 25) in their hometown paper, after breaking out at Ciro's in Los Angeles several weeks earlier on Academy Awards night.  They were supposed to open for Janis Paige but Hollywood's enthusiasm for the act subsequently forced the manager to give them top billing.  Davis' impressions of celebrities like James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart--supposedly verboten in a still mostly segregated entertainment world--were as appealing as his dancing and singing.  Raved the New York Daily News critic:

As the old saying goes, God made Sammy as ugly-looking as He could, and then hit him in the face with a shovel. But the young Samuel doesn’t need any beauty because he sure has got everything else . . . 

Davis, born in 1925, grew up in Harlem and on the road as vaudeville gigs were fewer and farther between.  By the age of seven he had appeared as a child running for president (!) in a short film starring Ethel Waters targeted at Black audiences. The discrimination he faced as the youngest member of the Will Mastin Trio hadn't permeated his consciousness as much as poverty had.  It took enlistment in the U.S. Army to expose him to the taunts and physical abuse that he would suffer in pre-Civil Rights America, and which strengthened his determination to succeed.

My talent was the weapon, the power, the way for me to fight. It was the one way I might hope to affect a man’s thinking.

There are two constants in Yes, I Can:  Davis's all-consuming desire to keep the nightclub applause and standing ovations coming while also conquering Hollywood and Broadway, and the humiliating racism he faces in trying to achieve these goals.  They combine to produce a career as electrifying as it is problematic in terms of legacy, particularly from a modern perspective.

Broadway (1964)
In becoming the "world's greatest living entertainer" he had to rely on white audiences and gatekeepers.  The show biz crowd embraced him early, allowing him to supplement his prodigious natural talent and early family example with the encouragement and guidance of contemporaries like Frank Sinatra, Mickey Rooney, Milton Berle and Jerry Lewis.  At the same time, he was determined to live like a "star," but he soon learned that was easier said than done when he often wasn't allowed to eat or sleep in the same places they were. To compensate, he began spending lavishly on clothes, jewelry and cars as well as giving extraordinarily generous tips, gifts and parties.  Davis eventually converted to Judaism, which really threw America for a loop.

His fame quickly became a lightning rod. The tabloid press, eager to stir the national pot, published photos of Davis teasing romances with women like Ava Gardner and Kim Novak even though he denies they were anything other than friends. A sham, short-lived marriage to a Black woman did little to tamp down the frenzied speculation, and his marriage to May Britt suggested that the gossips had been right all along. 

Wedding Day (1960)
Nor did Black America embrace him as on of their own, although Davis--who insisted he was colorblind--went to considerable lengths to change attitudes so long as it didn't slow his ascent or inconvenience him. Prior to 1957, for example, whenever he performed in Miami Beach, he would have to return to the Carver Hotel in Overtown, a mostly Black neighborhood across the bay in Miami, or risk being arrested under a municipal law.  But when a gig at the Eden Roc included a luxury suite provided by a progressive hotelier, the owners of the Carver gave him a lot of grief for not staying there as he always had.  It's hard to question Davis's decision if you've ever been to both Miami Beach and Overtown.  

Wall Mural, Frankies on Melrose Restaurant, Hollywood
Still, Yes I Can drops a disproportionate number of white names. There's no mention of Eartha Kitt, Sidney Poitier or Dorothy Dandridge, Davis's costars in Anna Lucasta and Porgy and Bess, but he spends several pages lamenting his initial impression of neighbor James Dean as a weirdo, perhaps because Dean didn't survive a horrible car crash in 1955 as Davis had a year earlier, when he lost his left eye.  Davis credits a gruff Bogart for his reluctant decision to replace his eyepatch with a glass prosthetic instead. There's even a  command performance for Queen Elizabeth.

Davis idolized Frank Sinatra, with good reason.  Ol' Blue Eyes insisted that the Will Mastin Trio open for him at the Capitol Theater in 1947, at the peak of his bobbysoxer appeal, and interceded in other ways to ensure that Davis was treated in the same manner as white performers.  He rushed to the hospital after Davis crashed his car and offered him a role in Ocean's 11 which branded the Rat Pack on celluloid. There's absolutely no doubt that Davis's "Black mascot" membership contributed to his reputation as "Mr. Entertainment" even if some of the comic bits (You ain't lived until you've seen colored Jewish pickets!) seem more than a little cringe today.

Towards the end of the book, Davis writes about postponing his 1960 wedding to Britt until after the presidential election so that Sinatra, who has been campaigning hard on behalf of John F. Kennedy, won't have to choose between politics and their friendship. He fears that Sinatra's presence at his interracial nuptials will alienate Democrats in the South, where more than a dozen states still enforce anti-miscegenation laws. Davis also describes his fruitless efforts to raise money for Martin Luther King in Harlem where the businessmen he approaches turn him down on the grounds that things will never change.

Sammy Davis, Jr. by Charles White
They do, of course, at least to a certain extent,  as the result of Civil Rights Act, passed the year before the publication of Yes I Can.  The timing couldn't have been better (perhaps even connected) because likely book buyers now could take comfort in the fact that the discrimination that Davis faced was now illegal. 

From both a political and personal perspective, Yes I Can could not have ended more happily, with Britt giving birth to their healthy daughter. But Davis lived another 35 years and remained tabloid fodder to the very end.  He began to drink heavily and snort coke after an affair with dancing partner Lola Falana--known as the Black Venus--ends his marriage to Britt in 1968.  Four years later, he endorsed Richard M. Nixon for president, beguiled by the tricky Republican's unrealized plan to increase Black wealth through capitalist enterprise. He brought his girlfriend home to live with his third wife who, after Davis died in 1990, owing $5 million in back federal taxes, had his body exhumed to recover $70,000 worth of jewelry that she then sold to pay off part of his debt.

Sammy Davis Jr.'s Tap Shoes
National Museum of African American History & Culture
But the messiness of his later years can't diminish the dynamo's tap dancing, his way with a song, or the fond regard with which his show business peers held him.  It says a lot more about the price he had to pay for becoming "the world's greatest living entertainer" in a still segregated society.



David Hockney (1937-2026)

Passport Photo by David Sharkey (1979)

I always did what I wanted to do.  I've done what I wanted to do every day.

Has there ever been a simpler expression of the gay quid pro quo?  

David Hockney lured me to the New York Metropolitan Opera for the very first time in 1981. Bob O'Hearn, David's mentor, implied that no respectable homosexual could afford to miss his sets and costumes for Parade. He designed the poster, too. I can't remember a thing about the night except that we bought standing room tickets and the stage was as colorful as Candyland.


I paid a lot less attention to art in my youth than I do now.  Hockney's dandyism and homosexuality made a bigger impression than his work which, I later learned, really never stopped coming:  he created for more than 70 years, eventually embracing the i-Pad as enthusiastically as his paint brushes. I seriously considered hopping on a plane to see Hockney 25, his career-long retrospective of 400 works at the Fondation Louis Vuitton and then continuing on to London through the Chunnel to see Leigh Bowery! at the Tate, but recovery from knee surgery intervened.

But thanks to a Getty Museum visit in 2000, I have awoken most mornings of the 21st century to an expensively framed (in white ash!) souvenir of his Polaroid-inspired work.  It speaks to me on so many levels:  photography, collage and location.  Sadly, the sunniness of my bedroom at 47 Pianos has faded it, adding an oddly conceptual element Hockney might have appreciated.

"Pearl Blossom Highway" (1986)
I didn't get to see a survey of his work until 2018 at the Met, the year we bought the Folly. I lugged the catalog to Florida because we had a pool, too, just like the cover image.  Peter Schlesigner, Hockney's first lover, is the man in the jacket.  The painting is a reaction to the painful end of their relationship.  Art critics have inferred that the man swimming is Schlesinger's new boyfriend.

Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures) (1972)

Both Hockney and Schlesinger play themselves in A Bigger Splash, a cinéma vérité-like documentary, filmed from 1970 to 1973, which chronicles their break-up and includes a scene of Hockney destroying an earlier version of the painting.


But like most gay men, they must have gotten over it.  For several years after they stopped living together Schlesinger continued to model for Hockney before pursing an art career out of his shadow.

"Peter Schlesinger with Polaroid Camera" (1977)
Hockney seems to have invested a lot more effort in painting his first lover than his last, a former studio assistant with whom he spent his final 20 years.  Meow!  But like they always say, the first cut is the deepest--ain't that the truth?

JP Gonçalves de Lima, 3rd November 2021
A devoted son, Hockney spent the Christmas holidays with his parents in West Yorkshire until both passed.

"My Parents" (1977)
As I learned more about the man from his obituary, I wondered if he and Andy Warhol might have been what we today call frenemies.  Born less than a decade apart, they certainly had a lot in common:  their sexual orientation, very close relationships with their mothers, early and enduring fame, and their embrace of Polaroids.  Their agreement to swap portraits in the early 70s suggests that Hockney got the better end of the deal, and no one ever tried to assassinate him!



But in Hockney's portrait, Warhol hardly looks like man whom Hockney later said represented "a certain Bohemia."


Sunday, June 7, 2026

Famesick (4*)


Before I knew Lena Dunham had a memoir in the works, I re-watched "Girls" to see if it held up.  IMHO few shows ever has been as entertaining and I laughed as much as I had a decade earlier, even though I'm now almost 50 years older than all of the principals. No matter what the era, our twenties are an eventful period when we're finally navigating life as adults and everything seems to have a heightened significance as we smooth off our rough edges in bed, at leisure and at work.  Hannah Horvath remains completely relatable, if just as fucked up in so many ways, but aren't we all?

Dunham's comic, brutally frank take on sex particularly interested me in 2010 in part because I'd never seen it on television before, but also because it reminded me of what I had been doing in Chasing Rapture, a blog I had begun in my late 40s, shortly before 9/11. If none of my hook-ups became emotionally satisfying relationships, I could at least treat them as funny stories to tell publicly, using the internet.  Dunham did the same thing, literally exposing herself on HBO before an audience of nearly a million people who watched each "Girls" episode when it aired on Sunday nights.  Twitter functioned as the national water cooler and everybody had an opinion, in part because Dunham herself--a body type that would have been shamed by the "Sex and the City" women--was so polarizing.

I thought she was the bravest, funniest woman in the world.  I still do, although I wouldn't trade places with her for a second.

Famesick begins with her college years at Oberlin and chronicles her meteoric rise in show biz after the successful screening of Tiny Furniture, her independent film, at South by Southwest.  It was a real family affair: in addition to Dunham herself, the cast included her mother, her now trans brother and Jemima Kirke, her high school bestie, and she shot the film in her parents' Tribeca apartment (from the outset of her career, Dunham ignored boundaries, inexorably to her peril).  Her double-edged characterizations of mom and Kirke demonstrate why gossiping on the phone with Dunham, if not actually hanging out with her, must be such a blast. 

This was, after all, the woman who told me not to hold her hand on the way to fifth grade because it would only increase my social isolation.

[Jemima Kirke] was my muse. She had always been the person I aspired to behave like—part Lolita, part Keith Richards, with a healthy dose of indie sleaze and a haughty sense of manners about very specific things like being late.

Just weeks after SXSW, Dunham is on a plane to Hollywood.  For the next hundred or so pages, her LOL prose--which describes every domestic and professional detail of her supercharged ascent to white hot fame--feels like a vicarious joyride with an occasional yellow light warning her to slow down.

Ti picked me up at the airport. Our first stop was Lemonade, a restaurant I wanted to go to because it was frequented by the cast of The Hills. Our next stop was his apartment, a dank single room up a steep set of stairs in the hills of Los Feliz, where—like so many men before him—he slept with only a coverless duvet and a Pulp Fiction poster.

Dunham with help from Judd Apatow and Jenji Kohan, a mentor, wrote and directed "Girls," which became a phenomenon shortly before her 26th birthday.  She acted in it, too, for not all that much money given the scope of her responsibilities and the pressures of nurturing a creative baby that bewitched the chattering class.  

Some actors joke that they work for free, and what they’re really paid for is the press. I’d say that I worked for free every second, and what I was paid for was everything I lost by doing that.

Dunham bonds with Kohan like Super Glue and while Kohan, a generation older with young children, is key to the success of the show they co-run for all six seasons, she inevitably prioritizes production and her compensation over Dunham's mental and physical health. This is, after all, Hollywood, and Dunham comes to realize that exploitation and manipulation had crept into their highly simpatico relationship, too.

Part of Taylor Swift's appeal has been writing oblique lyrics inspired by her love life. Dunham, a friend, goes the very explicit route with Jack Antonoff who comes off a lot better in these pages than his obvious stand-in did on Too Much, Dunham's Netflix show earlier this year.  They're introduced by the musician's sister.

I kept thinking, Is this what a date with a real person feels like? I had the sense that this was the prize I was being given for every encounter that had left me bruised and bleeding, every boy and man who had used my body like a cum sock, the reward for patience and hard work, a sign that things were really and truly coming into alignment.

But when their fairy-tale relationship begins to fall apart, mostly due to her exhaustion and health problems, she detours into coy, declining to identify the person she seems to be blaming, at least initially. 

Jack was still in the studio with the singer, who seemed to me both very young and impossibly mature, so even-keeled and focused that it made me want to throw my toys out of my pram.

An internet search based on other very specific clues provided by a disingenuous Dunham confirms that it's Lorde who, according to Antonoff, is more interested in making music than befriending his significant other of five years.  Ouch!

Nevertheless, Antonoff's comment reinforces what may very well explain why Dunham has struggled so much with her relationships, both male and female.  It's the same bugaboo that afflicts all of us:  our parents.  No one will ever love Lena as much as her father who, in spite of his devotion to his daughter, paints cartoonish images of genitalia, a fact that Dunham herself calls out.  And while her mother, a proud artist in her own right, is fiercely protective, tenderness doesn't appear to be in her maternal toolbox which may explain why Dunham adores Nora Ephron, a mentor who didn't need anything from her.  Has anyone ever written so lovingly of Carl Bernstein?

I won't deny that I enjoyed reading about Dunham career blast-off a lot more than the accounts of her painful and debilitating health problems. 

At this point, I was starting to understand that illness wasn’t just a town I was passing through, but a city that I was going to pay taxes in. They were still hoping for the occasionally fragile girl with the random rashes and shitty periods they’d agreed to love. Nobody understood how much pain that girl was already withstanding from the minute she started walking. Not even me.

But even the really bad stuff is compelling and occasionally evokes a laugh.  For privacy reasons, she checks into a plastic surgery center specializing in labiaplasty for yet another gynecological procedure that provides no relief.  It's decorated with purple sofas.

I felt as though I were working at a New Orleans brothel, passing time before the next john arrived.

When Dunham pleads with one top-notch doctor to perform a hysterectomy, his sexism apparently outweighs his judgment, which also makes me wonder why she never seemed to consult any female gynecologists.

“No. Inside the uterus is the woman herself. Her spirit. Her passion. It is like reaching inside and yanking out her very soul. I have seen it before my eyes—women change into people they do not recognize. I cannot do this to you.”

She also mines her stint in rehab for opiate and Klonopin addiction in a way that Ephron, who insisted "everything is copy" would have admired

[A young woman in rehab] also felt strongly that the [Pink] song was by an addict about addiction; it felt cruel to tell her its producer [Jack Anonoff] was actually scared that MDMA would drain his spinal fluid. 

As soon as we sat down, I realized I was starving. In fact, I’d been starving since the day the drugs started to leave my body, and now, most nights, I padded down to the kitchen and made myself an array of quite frankly shocking snacks. Fiber One cereal with goat yogurt and dried prunes. (I never want to feel the way I did on opiates again, and that’s all I’m going to say here about taking a shit.) 

Even when staring down the possibility that she won't be able to conceive a genetically-related child--something she's always wanted--through IVF treatments Dunham's nose for irony never fails her:

With a gay donor, I was “a user of fresh homosexual sperm” with “FDA-ineligible” jizz. (I didn’t know this when I chose my donor: If you find a hetero art school kid with a ketamine addiction, drag him off the street, and convince him to say he’s dating you, you’re congratulated. If you carefully select an accomplished gay friend of child-rearing age, you are taking a risk that the reproductive authorities won’t sign off on.)

Just guessing, but I'd put my money on Bill Clegg as that gay donor, whom she acknowledges as her literary agent (it's easy to imagine them clicking at a 12-step meeting) and who wrote his own memoir about recovery from addiction, which also became the basis of Keep The Lights On, a terrific film, written and directed by his former lover.    With a potential literary pedigree like that, the failure to fertilize Dunham's eggs is the world's loss as much as hers.

In an odd coincidence, Dunham published this memoir the same year that the centenary of Marilyn Monroe is being celebrated.  Here's what that earlier icon, just as smart and needy, had to say about celebrity in her last interview, published 23 years before Dunham took her first breath.

“Fame isn’t everything,” she said in 1962. “It warms you a bit. But that warming is temporary. It’s like caviar. It’s good to have caviar, but if you had it every damn day, you know?” She laughed. “Too much caviar.”

By the end of Famesick Dunham--who already has outlived Monroe by four years in spite of all the anguish her body and a rabidly judgmental internet have caused her--is finally laying off the caviar if not the candor.  

Good for her.





 


Friday, June 5, 2026

Lit Friday

It took me almost a lifetime to finally visit the American Academy of Arts and Letters in Upper Manhattan.  Pegasus once served as the organization's seal which seems kind of cool until you check out the winged horse's genealogy:  sired by Poseidon and foaled by Medusa!


The Academy is relying on its membership to come up with a new one, like this owl by Joan Jonas.  As a former Dowel Owl, I'm charmed, but the line drawing does lack the grandeur of its predecessor.


That's probably a step in the right direction.  The Academy, a membership organization founded in 1898, has been evolving for as long as that.  I got a lot more out of a visit to its website than the three buildings on Audubon Terrace, which also houses the Hispanic Museum and Library.  A little TLC could restore the terrace's considerable faded glory.  I particularly liked the statue of a charging El Cid and the bas relief of Don Quixote.



Three hundred American writers, artists, musicians and architects comprise the Academy. Foreign peers fill another 50 seats. This very exclusive, curriculum-vitae-burnishing club awards prizes of $5,000 to $25,000--many to younger creatives in these disciplines who aren't necessarily members. 

For example, Foreign Honorary Member E. M. Forster bequeathed royalties from the sale of Maurice to member Christopher Isherwood who arranged with the Academy to establish an award named for the older author to provide a cash prize (now worth $20,000) to young British or Irish writers for a stay in the United States.  Winners of the E.M. Forster Award have included Sally Rooney (2019),  Jez Butterworth (2007), Nick Hornby (1999), Colm Toibin (1995) and Alan Hollinghurst (1991).  Now that's what I call a significant ROI!

And why has someone who reads as much as I never heard of the William Dean Howells Medal? It's named for the father of American realism--he wrote The Rise of Silas Lapham, a book I was assigned as an English major at Columbia--and recognizes the best novel published by an American author during the past five years.  What should be as prestigious as the Man Booker, Pulitzer, National Book Award isn't. Too many Academy prizes and too few competent Academy publicists may be the problem.  I'll definitely be adding The Night Watchman by Louise Erdrich, the last winner, to my reading list.

New members are elected to replace those who died.  Surviving members eulogize those who have passed; these tributes--they go all the way back to 1905--are archived on the website.   Here's how Harold Bloom assessed Gore Vidal in 2012:  

When I try to sum up Gore's literary achievement, I would place Lincoln first, and then the novel Burr. In a very different mode, the sublime nastiness of Myra Breckinridge achieves a rancidity that Gore raises to a level of aesthetic splendor.


But back to the IRL Academy itself.  Under a different structure, early in its history, it had what I'll call a "star chamber," at least for book nerds like me.  BTW, that statue under the arch seems to move around, at least in historical photos. 



Metal plates denote who sat in each numbered chair.  Rachel Carson, Tennessee Williams, Alexander Calder and Norman Mailer were among those who planted their butts in number 19.


An exhibition of collages called "Knots" by Lucy Sante--my second since returning to New York this spring--drew me to the Academy in the first place.  BTW, she's not a member and I learned from the chatty young man keeping an eye on the library that Sante isn't a member and the Academy uses much of its space to exhibit works by artists who aren't.


He described the art form this way to the New York Times in April:

One principle of collage, for me is you have to kill one thing to make another. It’s a small-scale model of revolutionary behavior.


Sante's distinctive collages are hung in the Academy's Library.  



I must confess that I spent as much time checking out the shelves--which include every book published by or about a member--as the collages.  They're arranged alphabetically by the member's last name, in this case Allen Ginsberg.  Unfortunately, members whose last name falls after the letter "G" are kept in a non-public area due to lack of space, one of several frustrations I encountered during my visit.


Nor are visitors allowed to pull them from the shelves which, while understandable, remains irritating to a book nerd.  The collected works of Robert W. Chambers occupy all five shelves on the left side of this bookcase.  "Who?" you might ask, as I did but I had to wait for Wikipedia to answer the question.  


I also embarrassed myself when I asked why works by Mark Twain occupied one library corner.  "Because his real name was Samuel Clemens," I was told by the chatty young man. 

Mark Twain by Abbott Handerson Thayer (1881)
Yes, but had he read Willa Cather, Edith Wharton or Henry James (all members) who are represented in the gallery upstairs where items from the Academy's permanent collection are exhibited?  

This novel was the initial selection of a book club I organized not long after graduating from college

1926 Edition
. . . I still haven't gotten over the disappointment of Apple TV cancelling Sofia Coppola's planned adaptation of The Custom of the Country

Edith Wharton (at the age of 18) by
Edward H. May (1881)
. . . and The Portrait of a Lady remains my favorite classic novel of American literature.

Henry James by Abbott Handerson Thayer (ca 1881)
The unnamed gallery (a missed funding opportunity for sure) looks over Trinity Church Cemetery.  Two Academy members--John James Audubon and Ralph Ellison--are buried there.


The gallery has the opposite problem of the library:  too much space, particularly for the small size of most of the items exhibited except for the wall of paintings by Eugene Speicher, a successful 20th century portraitist.  Without ever having read a word by Robert W. Chambers, the library hog downstairs, I'm pretty certain I can say that I admired his paintings a lot more even if his body of work seems to have suffered the same fate.  IMHO, it's time for a reappraisal!


"Girl in Velvet Dress"
"Girl in Flower Dress" 
I ended my perfect Friday afternoon by walking nearly four miles south on Broadway to Barnes & Noble where German author Daniel Kehlmann was promoting the paperback release of The Director.  During a chance encounter in the elevator before the discussion and book signing, I got to tell him it was the best modern novel I've read in years.  He definitely deserves to become an Academy FHM for his literary reinvention of fiction based on historical figures and circumstances!

MJ Franklin & Daniel Kehlmann