Friday, June 13, 2025

Gallery Hopper Redux

Most of the gallery shows I had marked on my calendar while in Florida were about to close, so I saw four in a two-day period.  I saved the best--recent work by Salman Toor, whom I first encountered at the Whitney last fall--for last. 

"Ash Blonde" by Salman Toor (2024) 

The Human Situation


An April obituary for Marcia Marcus in the Times put the overlooked artist on my radar for the first time.  Lévy Gorvy Dayan cannily mounted a group show of her work with one of my favorite painters.  Quotes from the three women whose work is primarily represented greet visitors outside.

Self-Portrait (1979)
Figurative artists like Marcus, who was 97 when she died, didn't get a lot of love in her lifetime.  All I ask is that people look.

"Family II" (1970)
Just ask Alice Neel!  I paint my time using people as evidence.

"June" (1955)
She painted this provocative portrait more than 20 years before Demi Moore appeared on the cover of Vanity Fair in the same condition.

"Pregnant Nude" (1969)
"June Blum" (1972)
I wasn't familiar with Sylvia Sleigh, either.  A painting is a personal relationship.

"Legend:  Elaine Shipman" by Sylvia Sleigh (1974)
Of the three artists, Sleigh's work seems to be most powered by feminism.  Born in Wales a decade earlier than Marcus, she became a naturalized American and lived almost as long. Here, she paints a women's art collective. She's standing in the rear, second from the left. Imagine a man fading into the background!

"A.I.R. Group Portrait" by Sylvia Sleigh (1977-78)

Drift: Coming Home


Isaac White, who goes by "Drift," risked his life to take these extraordinary photographs exhibited at the Robert Mann Gallery where he was arrested and handcuffed the night the show opened.  It wasn't the first time.   Not-quite-as-brave NYPD officers used these background shots of the Empire State Building as evidence that he had trespassed.

"Don't Fear The Reaper" (2023)
Perfect Timing (2023)
Wright served his country for six years in the Army Special Forces.  He returned from a tour of duty in the Middle East with PTSD (if not vertigo!). 

"After the Storm" (2021)
Medical research supports his contention that his hobby is therapeutic. It certainly inspires awe.

"Foreshadowing" (2022)

Wish Maker


Salman Toor, a Pakistani artist, must be painting as fast as he can.  His recent, moody work fills two Luhring Augustine Galleries, with oil paintings in Chelsea and charcoal sketches in Tribeca. His homosexuality is evident in both, although more penises are visible in the latter.
 
"Skinny Boy" (2025)
You almost can hear a Grindr ping in this one.

"The Scroller" (2025)
"Cross Street" (2025)
"Daddy" (2024)
"Beach" (2023)

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Sly Stone (1943-2025)


Let me tell you, Chiffon--the DJ name I eventually adopted--was NOT a funky teen.  My musical taste didn't get much blacker than The Supremes and The 5th Dimension until I heard "Dance to the Music" on the car radio in 1967.  Sly and the Family Stone followed up in rapid succession with a series of infectious, utterly original singles I'm pretty sure even my Sinatra-loving parents didn't dislike.

The group's appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show, a year later, sealed the deal.  At the time, I'm not sure I could have put a finger on why their joyous performance resonated so much beyond the catchiness of the music but I realize now, more than 50 years later, that it completely captured the best of Sixties youth culture in America with its mostly unheralded mix of black, white, male and female people grooving together, quite a contrast to what Walter Cronkite had been reporting on the CBS Evening News. For this epiphany, I have to thank Questlove, whose two recent documentaries, Summer of Soul and Sly Lives: The Burden of Black Genius, have been a most welcome resurrection of a man whose greatest hits collection was one of the first CDs I ever bought, back in the early 1980s.

Of course, Sly's drug use undid him, or at least propelled him into near obscurity in comparison to his heyday.  When I saw him sing "I Want To Take You Higher" in Michael Wadleigh's brilliant Woodstock documentary--literally the "high" point of the three-hour film--it (and the triple album soundtrack I added to my record collection) whet my appetite to try weed as much as anything else, although Sly's frenetic moves were more characteristic of a powdered substance that brought down a lot of white musicians, too.  Woodstock played at El Paso's Northgate Theater, where my mother and I had earlier seen "roadshow" performances of My Fair Lady and Hello, Dolly! which required advance tickets. I left for college a year later and smoked my first joint with Tom, another marijuana virgin, although by then, The Who, Led Zeppelin and Traffic provided our musical accompaniment.

Flash forward a decade:  I'm spending my lunch hour in the Periodical Room of the New York Public Library, where I worked at the time, catching up on the latest magazines.  An Esquire profile of Doris Day--who later became my female role model in the Pines--rumored that she and Sly had been an item.  It blew my mind but also explained what may have been a subconscious part of his early--and then verboten-- appeal: sexual attraction.  I mean just get a load of him in that crazy fringed vest and gold chains on the Sullivan show. 

Boom shakalaka indeed!


Saturday, June 7, 2025

Creation Lake


Just because Rachel Kushner leaves me feeling intellectually challenged doesn't mean I don't thoroughly enjoy her elucidation of various unexpected and unfamiliar topics.  These would include anthropology, French history and Polynesian navigation in Creation Lake, a peculiar but utterly compelling novel about a commune of left-wing activists trying to prevent the engineering of a mega basin.  Corporate interests want to irrigate factory-farmed corn crops in a rural area of southwestern France that Kushner dubs the Guyenne, displacing both the people and the cows that have populated it for centuries.

Sadie, the novel's clear-eyed narrator, comes off at first blush (although she never would blush) like a stone-cold bitch once employed by the American government to entrap domestic terrorists, collateral damage be damned.  I employ the sexist slur purposefully because Kushner's feminist agenda quickly emerges:  if a man were to use seduction unsuccessfully in service of his undercover work, surely he wouldn't be judged as harshly as this reader judged Sadie.  She views both men and the world through an occasionally comic but always withering lens:

It’s the same, whether you’re in a relationship with a man or pretending to be in one. They want you to listen when they tell you about their precious youth. And if they are my age, which Lucien is—we are both thirty-four—their younger boyhood, the innocent years, are the 1980s, and their teendom, the goodbye to innocence, is the 1990s, and whether in Europe or the US, it’s similar music and more or less the same movies that they want to trot out and reminisce over, from an era I personally consider culturally stagnant . . . With Lucien and boys like him—who will forever remain mere boys—there is no war nor suffering nor valor. There is only some bland girl, some banal pop song, a romantic comedy, an August vacation.

At the same time, Sadie also has breast implants because they serve her well as a tool of her trade.  She contains multitudes.

But the novel has a much bigger theme on its mind:  evolution, which of course encompasses the establishment and dominance of the patriarchy that women continue to confront on a daily basis.  Using her gender and her Americanness, Sadie easily infiltrates the commune, which calls itself Le Moulin.  While seeking evidence of destructive tactics, she hacks into their continuing e-mail correspondence with Bruno Lacombe, the rag-tag group's charismatic mentor.  By the end of the book, Sadie has fallen under his spectral spell, or to use one of Kushner's guiding metaphors, he has become her "north star" with knowledge he himself has acquired in the utter darkness of the same network of caves where early man once drew.  However, she does not let her increasing fascination get in the way of executing her murderous assignment, although another American does, with a contemptuous hubris that recalls Harvey Weinstein.

Bruno's guru-like appeal is evident early on in a discussion of his post-World War II childhood when, displaced from his family, members of the Resistance who have been killed by the Nazis, he is thrilled to discover the helmet and body of a dead German soldier, from which the adolescent boy catches lice, a tiny metaphor that carries well more than their combined body weight throughout the novel.  He describes this incident as a "screen memory."

I regard my childhood encounter with this enemy helmet, he said, as a stutter or shift in the axis of my existence, one that has been critical to who I am, and to what I have come to believe.

It reminded me very much of the importance I attribute to visiting a Holocaust museum in Paris with my father when I was a little younger than Bruno, although upon further elaboration a screen memory turns out to be something quite different.  Bruno explains that it actually "screens" the emotions he tamped down about the traumatic loss of his family, leaving me to question exactly what was behind mine.  Perhaps my mother's repeated hospitalizations which forced us to leave France, a place I loved. 

There's also an enjoyably "meta" aspect to Creation Lake which regularly sent me to Wikipedia to determine how much, if anything that Bruno writes about, is based in reality. Some is, some isn't.  Guy Debord, a Marxist radical and Bruno's nemesis, exists; Boris Nevsky, a Soviet anthropologist does not.  Although Kushner's description of the Cagots, a persecuted minority in France whose origins date back to 1000 BC, is accurate, she embellishes their history with mass public beheadings to give her narrative an added class frisson.  

It's almost as if Kushner is explicitly acknowledging the parallel between what both she and Sadie do extraordinarily well:  make-up shit that gets you where you need to go.

Sadie finds peace; Kushner landed on the short list for the Booker Prize.  Well-done wimmin!

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Floyd Collins (3*)


Star power overcame any reluctance I had about going to a musical with a score by Adam Guettel, despite his lineage and success which at least must be partially attributed to nepotism.  A walk to the Vivian Beaumont listening to the original cast recording of Floyd Collins suggested my eagerness to see Jeremy Jordan, mostly immobile in dirty overalls but in pristine voice, had been a mistake.  Not a single song came closing to hooking me, although I reminded myself that I hadn't been a fan of Pacific Overtures, my first Sondheim musical, either.  Maybe I'll grow to love "How Glory Goes," or at least tolerate the vocalizing intended to evoke a cave's echoing but I doubt it.

What is it about celebrating old exploited white guys this season on Broadway?  Like Dead Outlaw (vastly more entertaining!), Floyd Collins, also an actual historical figure from the early 20th century, becomes famous for the tragedy that befalls him. Trapped in a cave for two weeks, he becomes a household name thanks to an interview with an intrepid newspaper reporter. The story, eventually broadcast all over the nation by the emergence of radio, lures thousands of Americans to congregate at the site in Kentucky, nearly fulfilling his dream in a final cruel irony.  Only the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby got more ghoulish traction in the press.

But nothing--not a well constructed-book fleshed out with some believable social and family dynamics and superb direction (both by Tina Landau) or terrific performances (especially by the menschy Taylor Trensch as the cub reporter), not even a blindingly white number in heaven that frees Jordan from his chaise lounge--can save this tuneless show from becoming an ever-so-respectable snooze fest.  


Sunday, June 1, 2025

Dead Outlaw (4*)

 

Trust me, you've never seen anything quite like Dead Outlaw: a lively musical about a desiccated corpse based on a story that brings to mind a Grateful Dead lyric:  what a long strange strip it's been.

Thanks to the preservative properties of arsenic, Elmer Curdy, a hapless train robber dead by the age of thirty, had a busy afterlife with spells of hibernation that lasted long enough to take him from pay-per-view in an unpaid funeral parlor to a carnival sideshow, a cross country marathon promoting Route 66 and Hollywood.  Only after his arm broke off in a California amusement park did he finally finding concrete-clad peace in the Oklahoma town where a posse had killed him--wait for it--66 years earlier!

Now, half a century later, Curdy, as embodied by the even-more-scary-alive-than-dead Andrew Durand, is still selling tickets, this time to a slightly more genteel audience in a Tony-nominated production on Broadway. If he's a little hard to warm up to in the lively first half, he brings down the house without moving a muscle in the second.  Band leader Jeb Brown narrates the unbelievable tale with an occasional reassurance, and a small cast, including several rollicking juke joint musicians, fills a dozen different supporting roles with uniform excellence.  Appropriate period costume and simple, evocative set design complete the trifecta of perfect production.  As Thomas Noguchi, Thom Sesma transforms the former "coroner to the stars" (I vividly recall his autopsy reports on Sharon Tate and Natalie Wood) into a Las Vegas crooner whose macabrely funny eleventh hour number increases the already abundant eclecticism of the score and lyrics by David Yazbek and Erik Della Penna.

No show about a dead guy should be this exhilarating particularly one that may leave more sensitive audience members asking what form Elmer Curdy's relentless exploitation will take in the next century.  The sadly deceased, leaving no estate or heirs, already has more than paid his dues in two.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Smash (4*)



I rarely laugh as hard in the theater as I did at Smash, around mid-point.  The book, cleverly adapted from a TV show that lasted just two seasons on NBC more than a decade ago, definitely puts the comedy back into musical comedy and not just because Tony-nominated Brooks Ashmanskas is truly hilarious as a beleaguered, besotted director.

A re-hashed behind-the-scenes look at a Broadway production about Marilyn Monroe called Bombshell may be too meta for some but this labor of theater-kid love more than delivers with its superb choreography and backstage intrigue, complete with poisoned cupcakes and an acting coach (Kristine Neilsen) who looks a lot like Mitch McConnell in a nun's habit, amplifying her obnoxiousness.  Co-writers Bob Martin and Rick Elice milk Marilyn's "method" to nourish the show's arc giving it a clear focus in two acts that it lacked over two seasons. They also take sharp and funny aim at the changes in theatre-going wrought by social media with a surprising cameo by Jeff Hiller and a Generation Z plant (Nicholas Matos) who eventually gives the show its heart and stirring finale.

Oddly, given the fact that I downloaded twenty songs from the i-Tunes store  (at $0.99 a pop) when Smash first aired, the music disappointed a little, perhaps because some of my favorite numbers by Marc Shaiman and Scott Wittman have have been truncated ("Mr. & Mrs. Smith") or omitted ("I Can't Let Go").  And, for plot-related reasons, the show stopping "Let Me Be Your Star" has been snatched from Bombshell understudy Caroline Bowman, although Bella Coppola does a terrific job while at the same time making a point about how much casting in the theater has evolved in recent years.  Look no further than Sunset Blvd. for current evidence.

Small quibbles, though, for a first-rate production that joyously celebrates Broadway, one of the most compelling reasons to remain in New York City, especially after a five month-drought in Florida.  




Tuesday, May 27, 2025

The Committed (4*)


I wonder if Matthew Winston, who taught a course on black humor at Columbia early in his academic career, read The Sympathizer, Viet Thanh Nguyen's prequel to The Committed, before he died in 2020?  Both books--really an enormous, two-part novel--would have been right at home on his memorable reading list, which included works by Vladimir Nabokov and William Burroughs as well as  Louis-Ferdinand Céline, Eugène Ionesco and Alfred Jarry.

However, this bravura passage in The Committed--one of dozens--surely would have given Winston who published an essay on the genre in 1978 that credited André Breton, another Frenchman, for naming the genre, pause. 

And who is the scriptwriter but you? Still, as the person penning this scenario, you are only partly in control, for you are not the producer of what is clearly a black comedy, even if calling a comedy black is kind of, sort of, maybe, perhaps, residually racist, although if you suggested that to a Frenchman, or even to an American, and most probably to a Vietnamese, he would indignantly denounce you as racist for seeing something racial in an innocent use of the word “black.” Just a coincidence! Nothing to do with black markets, or blackface, or how the French, in a really wonderful turn of phrase, call ghostwriters nègres—niggers!—the sheer bravado of it taking your breath away when you heard it for the first time. But why take offense over a playful use of words, when it really was the case that ghostwriters were just slaves, minus the whipping, raping, lynching, lifetime servitude, and free labor? Still—what the hell?—if words are just words, then let’s call it a white comedy, shall we?  It’s just a joke, take it easy, a bad joke, sure, but so was the Unholy Trinity of colonialism, slavery, and genocide, not to mention the Dynamic Duo of capitalism and communism, both of which white people invented and which were contagious, like smallpox and syphilis. 

To the best of my recollection, the Brooklyn-born Winston, who was active in the civil rights movement and ended up teaching at the University of Alabama for nearly 25 years, never questioned Breton's color choice. And that omission alone says everything about how much more interesting literature has gotten in the 21st century with the inclusion of so many different voices in a newly emerging canon of great works. 

That said, few writers are as head-spinningly talented as Viet Thanh Nguyen, who does for France in The Committed what he did for America in The Sympathizer.  In other words, there are hysterical takedowns of their respective colonial cultures in the wake of their grinding defeats by Viet Nam, a small country whose continued schizophrenia I witnessed first-hand as I travelled from north to south.  If I enjoyed The Sympathizer more, it's probably because of my greater familiarity with the target, despite a brief childhood interlude spent in Orleans.

Not that Nguyen exempts his own culture from equally merciless examination in an expansive novel that ultimately refuses to take sides, in the sense that while no value system is spared, none is entirely villainized either, except perhaps post-revolutionary governments whose primary objective becomes clinging to power.

Although I did not say so out loud, I wondered if perhaps authentic Vietnamese culture should also include gambling, which we taught to our children during Tet celebrations and then wondered why we had a predilection for gambling as adults; or smoking and drinking coffee in cafés, for which, if there were an Olympic competition for such a sport, we Vietnamese men would be gold medal contenders, for we treated these cafés, inherited from the French, as second homes away from abrasive wives and pesky children; or drinking beer, cognac, and wine (preferably of the native rice kind) until we reached the doorway to oblivion, whereon some of us beat the aforementioned wives and children or each other; or getting a good deal, even at the expense of our customers or our merchants or our principles, and then being outraged when we ourselves were cheated; or gossiping about our friends and relatives, whom we loved to backstab even more than stabbing our enemies, whose backs were harder to reach; or taking pride in the accomplishments of our neighbors and countrymen, until they accomplished too much, whereupon we resented them and waited for the sweet opportunity to gleefully witness their downfall; or making the women stay in the kitchen and serve the men, or expecting said women to reproduce at least six or seven times, and hopefully more, until their uteruses were as dusty as the Sahara—all aspects of our culture we performed much more frequently than a fan dance, or singing a snatch of opera or folk song, or wearing a silk gown, or reenacting a courtship ritual in the rice paddies, which only ever happened once in a lifetime, if at all, and if it did, likely involved scraping off the buffalo dung encrusted between our toes and swatting away the squadrons of dive-bombing mosquitoes.

The motormouth narrator, who can't be killed by a bullet because he remains nameless (unlucky him!), has fled to France after he and his blood brother, Bon, a stone-cold south Vietnamese killer with good reason, have been released from a north Vietnamese re-education camp, administered by Man, their third blood brother whose face has been burned off by American napalm, rendering him unrecognizable to Bon if not the narrator, the former sympathizer.  This trio--two true believers and a skeptic who can see both sides of everything--enables Nguyen to explore a complex web of themes including friendship, colonialism, religion, communism, sexism, capitalism and expatriatism with an incredible facility for apt metaphor.

The Vietnamese who came to France and did not feel at home returned to Vietnam to fight for the revolution or were deported by the French who suspected them of not being French enough. These were the Vietnamese who believed so sincerely in liberty, equality, and fraternity that they did not see the parentheses, which the French used in place of hyphens: “liberty, equality, and fraternity (but just not yet, at least for you).” Flabbergasted, these revolutionaries became the indigestible Vietnamese, the ones who could not swallow France and who could not be swallowed. As for the Vietnamese who stayed in France, French culture had chewed on them since they were in Vietnam. By the time they came to France, they were already, like certain species of cheese, quite soft and easily digestible, qualities inherited by their ideologically pasteurized children.

Absolutely nothing is sacred, in particular the Catholicism of the narrator's own French father.

Being tortured was, in that sense, like going to church. After a while, neither taught anything new. The ritual and the repetition simply reinforced knowledge already known but in danger of being forgotten, which was why torturers plied their trade not just with pliers but with the conviction of priests like my father, who tortured me in his own subtle way. The warm glow of sunrise lit up my dark interior, the same warm glow of sunrise that Jesus Christ must have seen every dawn that he survived hanging on his cross.

By now you've gotten the message that Nguyen is endlessly quotable.  Even better,  all his knowing verbiage serves an agenda solely committed to the principle of humanism. Professor Winston--who once insisted that "killing time is something embraced only by those who like their time dead"--may have overlooked the racism inherent in identifying humor as "black," but he certainly nailed its appeal.

A genre that assumes there are no answers cannot provide us with solutions, but it can keep us from following in the rigidly preordained paths of most literary plot. It can invite us to participate in the satisfying game of creating forms at the same time as we recognize the completeness and arbitrariness of the shapes we forge. It can present us with a sky full of stars and let us have the fun of making constellations.

Nguyen certainly presents us with a sky full of stars in The Committed, sometimes pop-cultural, my favorite kind.  Two final quotes:

You looked over a mural that covered an entire wall. It was mesmerizing, a photorealistic black-and-white painting of your half-naked countrymen and -women kneeling on the earth in what appeared to be a rubber plantation, wiry and grimy, wearing only tattered pants and headbands to keep the sweat out of their eyes. Their backs were to the painter, or to the viewer, their concentration focused on the woman striding among them, wearing a close-fitting vermilion dress that hugged an incredible form. In contrast to the rest of the mural, she was in full, blazing color, and she appeared to be the most beautiful woman in France, otherwise known as Catherine Deneuve. Why she had been transposed to a rubber plantation, only the painter knew. The only non-photorealistic detail about the entire mural was that Catherine Deneuve did not have sweat stains in the armpits of her dress or on the sternum-sticking front of her dress, for even the most beautiful woman in France, and therefore the world, must sweat like everybody else. 

*  *  *  *  *

You mumbled something inarticulate that simply made you seem starstruck, although in this case the star, Lana, was not a superstar whom everyone would recognize, like Cher, or Olivia Newton-John, or Karen Carpenter, but a distant star in a galaxy that required an ethnic telescope to see.